Journal of Co-operative Studies, 58(3), 90-97

Abstract

This paper starts from the critique, put forth by social and solidarity economy and post-growth scholarship, that the prevailing circular economic (CE) agenda reproduces central capitalist features like the pursuit of economic growth and technocratic resource management. As it has been argued, these features problematically undercut socio-ecological objectives such as material sufficiency, social wellbeing, and democratic control over resources. As ‘engines’ of the economy, however, enterprises may structure themselves and carry out activities in ways that challenge — or at least avoid reproducing — these capitalist logics, with co-operatives being a key example. This paper presents qualitative fieldwork with not-for-profit worker co-operatives focused on cycle repair and guided by post-growth values of community wellbeing and participation, economic democracy and justice, and ecological sustainability. It reflects on how these co-operatives leverage circularity to serve and build their communities, and how communities support circular resource management in cycle repair. The study also highlights pressures on the co-operatives’ activities and trade‑offs between workers’ economic interests and other socio-ecological interests. It concludes by suggesting avenues for practitioners to strengthen relations between cycle repair co-operatives and communities.

References

Aldred, R., Watson, T., Lovelace, R., & Woodcock, J. (2019). Barriers to investing in cycling: Stakeholder views from England. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 128, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.003

Batterbury, S., & Dant, T. (2019). The imperative of repair: Fixing bikes - for free. In F. Martínez & P. Laviolette, (Eds.), Repair, brokenness, breakthrough: Ethnographic responses (pp. 249-266). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1850hkq.24
 
Bellemare, M.-F., Martin-Déry, S., Ziegler, R., Vezina, M., Raufflet, E., & Walsh, A. (2022). Synergizing social economy and circular economy. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 13(1), 106-110. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser591
 
Bradley, K. (2018). Bike kitchens - Spaces for convivial tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2), 1676-1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.208
 
Bradley, K., & Persson, O. (2022). Community repair in the circular economy - fixing more than stuff. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 27(10-11), 1321-1337.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2041580
 
Cahen, C. (2016). "More than paint on concrete": The winding path toward bike equity. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 7(3), 1-9.  https://doi.org/10.7728/0703201605
 
Cooper, T., & Salvia, G. (2018). Fix it: Barriers to repair and opportunities for change. In R. Crocker & K. Chiveralls (Eds.), Subverting consumerism: Reuse in an accelerated world (pp. 147-165). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641812-9
 
Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2022). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(2), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187
 
de Chatillon, M. A. (2021). Feminine velonomy: Women's experiences of bicycle repair and maintenance in France and Australia. In D. Zuev, K. Psarikidou, & C. Popan (Eds.), Cycling societies: Innovations, inequalities and governance (pp.137-155). Routledge. 
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321092-11
 
de Chatillon, M. A. (2022). Velonomy and material mobilities: Practices of cycle repair and maintenance in Lyon, France and Melbourne, Australia (Publication No. tel-04096258) [Doctoral dissertation, École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (ENTPE)]. HAL Open Science. https://hal.science/ENTPE/tel-04096258v1

Dubb, S. (2016). Community wealth building forms: What they are and how to use them at the local level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 141-152. 
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0074
 
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2021, October 26). Universal circular economy policy goals: Enabling the transition to scale. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/universal-policy-goals/overview
 
European Commission. (2020, March 11). A new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe (COM/2020/98 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
 
Garcia Jané, J. (2024, February 29). Should cooperatives aim for growth? Green European Journal. https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/should-cooperatives-aim-for-growth/

Ghauri, S., Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2021). Co-operative principles and values: Does the talk match the walk? Journal of Co-operative Studies, 54(3), 7-22. 
https://doi.org/10.61869/PGNL4218
 
Guerreschi, A., & Díaz López, F. J. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on cooperatives in circular economy and eco-innovation studies. Sustainability, 15(21), Article 15595. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115595

Guinan, J., & O'Neill, M. (2019). The case for community wealth building. Polity.
https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12130
 
Hinton, J. (2021). Relationship-to-profit: A theory of business, markets, and profit for social ecological economics (Publication No. tel-04097146) [Doctoral dissertation, Université Clermont Auvergne & Stockholm University]. HAL Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12130
 
International Co-operative Alliance (2015). Guidance notes to the co-operative principles. https://ica.coop/en/media/library/the-guidance-notes-on-the-co-operative-principles
 
Kirchherr, J., Yang, N.-H. N., Schulze-Spüntrup, F., Heerink, M. J., & Hartley, K. (2023). Conceptualizing the circular economy (revisited): An analysis of 221 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 194, Article 107001. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001
 
Langmead, K. (2017). Exploring the performance of democracy and economic diversity in worker cooperatives (Publication No. 10.7190/shu-thesis-00102) [Doctoral dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University]. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive. https://shura.shu.ac.uk/23233/
 
Martin, K. (2014). Enacting ethical economies in real time, collectively: LA's bicycle kitchen. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(8), 980. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.916994
 
McLaren, D., Niskanen, J., & Anshelm, J. (2020). Reconfiguring repair: Contested politics and values of repair challenge instrumental discourses found in circular economies literature. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 8, Article 100046. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100046
 
Novkovic, S. (2012). The balancing act: Reconciling the economic and social goals of cooperatives. In M.-J. Brassard & E. Molina (Eds.), The amazing power of cooperatives: Texts selected from the international call for papers proposals (pp. 289-299). Québec 2012 International Summit of Co‑operatives.
 
Parrique, T. (2019). The political economy of degrowth (Publication No. tel-02499463) [Doctoral dissertation, Université Clermont Auvergne & Stockholm University]. HAL Open Science. https://theses.hal.science/tel-02499463v1
 
Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., Kerschner, C., Kraus-Polk, A., Kuokkanen, A., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling debunked: Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau. https://eeb.org/library/decoupling-debunked/
 
Piñeiro Harnecker, C. (2007). Workplace democracy and collective consciousness: An empirical study of Venezuelan cooperatives. Monthly Review, 59(6), 27-40. 
https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-059-06-2007-10_5
 
Preluca, A., Hakelius, K., & Mark-Herbert, C. (2022). Sustainability of worker co-operatives. Sustainability, 14(18), Article 11542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811542
 
Ranis, P. (2016). Cooperatives confront capitalism: Challenging the neoliberal economy. Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219373
 
Robra, B., & Hinton, J. B. (2024). Economic organizations and the transformation towards degrowth. In E. Weik, C. Land, & R. Hartz (Eds.), The handbook of organizing economic, ecological and societal transformation (pp. 209-232). De Gruyter. 
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110986945-011
 
Schmid, B. (2018). Structured diversity: A practice theory approach to post-growth organisations. Management Revue, 29(3), 281-310.  https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-3-281
 
Steinberger, J., Guerin, G., Hofferberth, E., & Pirgmaier, E. (2024). Democratizing provisioning systems: A prerequisite for living well within limits. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), Article 2401186.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2401186
 
Ünal, E., & Sinha, V. K. (2023). Sustainability trade-offs in the circular economy: A maturity-based framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4662-4682. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3386

Valentini, D., & Butler, A. (2023). Bike kitchens and the sociomateriality of practice change: Exploring cycling-repair relations. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1), Article 2259235. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2259235
 
Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Sahakian, M., González-Jamett, C., & Etxezarreta, E. (2023). Social and solidarity economy insights for the circular economy: Limited-profit and sufficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, Article 138050. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138050
 
Ziegler, R., Poirier, C., Lacasse, M., & Murray, E. (2023). Circular economy and cooperatives - An exploratory survey. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2530. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032530