Journal of Co-operative Studies, 58(3), 54-65
Making and unmaking co-operative subjects in the Oklahoma Food Co-operative
| Open access |  | Peer reviewed article | Published online: Dec 2025 |
Making and unmaking co-operative subjects in the Oklahoma Food Co-operative
Eric Sarmiento
Vol 58 No 3, pp. 54-65
https://doi.org/10.61869/LKGD5311
How to cite this article: Sarmiento, E. (2025). Making and unmaking co-operative subjects in the Oklahoma Food Co-operative. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 58(3), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.61869/LKGD5311
Abstract
This paper sketches the history of a food co-operative to understand the challenges of cultivating co-operative sensibilities, viewpoints, and practices in geographical locations dominated by largely capitalist economies. The founders of the Oklahoma Food Cooperative (OFC) placed inordinate emphasis on mobilising social and political differences to change their own perspectives on food systems and social justice, environmental stewardship, and economic sustainability — the co‑operative’s stated core values. To make sense of how this approach played out over time, I orient my analysis around critical conceptions of subjectivity, exploring via qualitative fieldwork and analysis how OFC members sought to transform their own subjective experience of food systems, economy, community, and other figures via sustained encounters with difference. This case illustrates the importance for co-operatives of attending to subject formation via practices that cultivate non-capitalist subjectivities while grappling with forces that undermine such efforts, some of which may seem unrelated to the market in which a given co-operative operates. For the OFC, these forces included not only food system dynamics but also urban redevelopment, catching members in a double bind of capitalist subjectivity that I argue contributed to the co-operative’s closure after 15 years.
Sarmiento (2025)
References
Alhojärvi, T. (2020). Critical Gibson-Graham: Reading capitalocentrism for trouble. Rethinking Marxism, 32(3): 286-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2020.1780667
Allen, P., & Guthman, J. (2006). From "old school" to "farm-to-school": Neoliberalization from the ground up. Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 401-415.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z
Bilewicz, A. (2018). A path to a countermovement? Forms of integration in Polish consumer cooperatives. Praktyka Teoretyczna, 27(1),133-167.
https://doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.1.6
Cornwell, J. (2012). Worker co-operatives and spaces of possibility: An investigation of subject space at collective copies. Antipode, 44(3), 725-744.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00939.x
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2014). Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512473869
Harris, E. (2009). Neoliberal subjectivities or a politics of the possible? Reading for difference in alternative food networks. Area, 41(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00848.x
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
Holloway, S. L., Holt, L., & Mills, S. (2018). Questions of agency: Capacity, subjectivity, spatiality and temporality. Progress in Human Geography, 43(3), 458-477.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518757654
Malewitz, J. (2013, April 24). Red River showdown: Texas-Oklahoma water war could reverberate across the US. Stateline. https://stateline.org/2013/04/24/red-river-showdown-texas-oklahoma-water-warcould-reverberate-across-us/
McDermott, M. (Ed.). (2006). Closer to home: Healthier food, farms and families in Oklahoma. A centennial report. Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture. https://kerrcenter.com/publication/closerhome-healthier-food-farms-families-oklahoma/
Miller, E. (2015). Anticapitalism or postcapitalism? Both! Rethinking Marxism, 27(3), 364-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2015.1042705
Mount, P. (2012). Growing local food: Scale and local food systems governance. Agriculture and Human Values, 29(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9331-0
National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2014). 2012 Census - Farm Economics. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2014/Farm_Economics/index.php
Payne, A. A., & Greiner, A. L. (2019). New-build development and the gentrification of Oklahoma City's Deep Deuce neighborhood. Geographical Review, 109(1), 108-130.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12294
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740-770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
Popke, E. J. (2003). Poststructuralist ethics: Subjectivity, responsibility and the space of community. Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 298-316. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph429oa
Rural Health Information Hub. (n.d.). Poverty, 2023 - Oklahoma. https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/charts/60?state=OK
Sarmiento, E. (2017). The affirming affects of entrepreneurial redevelopment: Architecture, sport, and local food in Oklahoma City. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(2), 327-349.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17743506
Sarmiento, E. (2020). Making sense of "local food," urban revitalization, and gentrification in Oklahoma City. In A. H. Alkon, Y. Kato, & J. Sbicca (Eds.), A recipe for gentrification: Food, power, and resistance in the city (pp. 71-90). NYU Press Scholarship Online.
https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479834433.003.0004
Sarmiento, E., & Gabriel, N. (2020). Becoming-genealogical: Power and diverse economies. Rethinking Marxism, 32(3), 368-389.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2020.1780671
Stengers, I. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22, 38-59. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.6
