Open accesscreativecommonsPeer reviewed/Research article
Published: December 2022

Practising sustainability beyond growth in eco-social entrepreneurship: An international comparative case study

Sunna KovanenORCID and Anna UmantsevaORCID

Vol 55 No 3, pp. 44-56

https://doi.org/10.61869/RPQX5421

How to cite this article: Kovanen, S. & Umantseva, A. (2022). Practising sustainability beyond growth in eco-social entrepreneurship: An international comparative case study. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 55(3), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.61869/RPQX5421

Abstract

This paper explores whether and how eco-social enterprises (ESEs) in rural areas are able to foster sustainability beyond growth in their daily practice. We approach sustainability beyond growth as a radical intertwining of social, ecological and economic concerns, where economy is understood as the secure and long-term fulfilling of basic needs within planetary limits. The study compares daily practices of five established ESEs in Brandenburg, Germany and Alentejo, Portugal. The ESEs represent the fields of agriculture and tourism and are diverse in their organisational forms and sizes. The data includes ethnography, interviews and document analysis. According to the results, ESEs support transition towards sustainability beyond growth and extractivism by facilitating slow, caring and respectful production practices that balance the needs of nature and human participants. While findings demonstrate such practices across all organisational forms and sizes, they were the most ambitious and heterogeneous in large co-operatives in less peripheral locations with more initial resources. Ethical negotiations on economic risk-sharing and decision-making were intertwined in and stabilised by market relations and hierarchical decision-making. Small and peripheral ESEs need to balance between the risk of exclusivity, precarity, complexity of diverse participation and limited resources for coordination.


PDF

References

Beacham, J. (2018). Organising food differently: Towards a more-than-human ethics of care for the Anthropocene. Organization, 25(4), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418777893

Benalcázar, P. C., & Ullán de la Rosa, F. J. (2021). The institutionalized Buen Vivir: a new hegemonic political paradigm for Ecuador. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 64(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202100101
 
Bresnihan, P. (2015). The more-than-human commons: From commons to commoning. In S. Kirwan, L. Dawney, & J. Brigstocke (Eds.), Space, power and the commons (pp. 105-124). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731995
 
Collard, R-C., & Dempsey, J. (2020). Two icebergs: Difference in feminist political economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(1), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19877887
 
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
 
Demorgrafieportal (2022). Regionale bevölkerungsentwicklung in Brandenburg. https://www.demografie-portal.de/DE/Fakten/bevoelkerungsentwicklung-regional-brandenburg.html

Dieckmann, M., & Thieuvsen, L. (2019). Soziale nachhaltigkeit durch community supported agriculture. Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit - Beiträge zur sozial-ökologischen Transformationsforschung 5, 93‑110. https://doi.org/10.17879/sun-2019-2473
 
Egmose, J., Jacobsen, S. G., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., & Hulgård, L. (2021). The regenerative turn: On the re-emergence of reciprocity embedded in living ecologies. Globalizations, 18(7), 1271-1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1911508
 
Federici, S. (2018). Re-enchanting the world. Feminism and the politics of the commons. PM Press.
 
Fletcher, R., Murray Mas, I., Blanco-Romero, A., & Blázquez-Salom, M. (2019). Tourism and degrowth: An emerging research agenda for research and praxis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1745-1763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1679822
 
Fraser, N. (2014). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society, 43(4), 541-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.898822
 
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). Postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota Press.
 
Gonzalez, R. A. (2017). Going back to go forwards? From multi-stakeholder cooperatives to open cooperatives in food and farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 278-290. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.018
 
Hickel, J. (2019). The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: Growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 873-884. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1947
 
Houtbeckers, E. (2018). Framing social enterprise as post-growth organising in the diverse economy. Management Revue, 29(3), 257-280. 
https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2018-3-257
 
Hyvärinen, P. (2020). Building upon, extending beyond: Small-scale food production within a Nordic welfare state. In T. Eskelinen, T. Hirvilammi, & J. Venäläinen (Eds.), Enacting community economies within a welfare state (pp. 71-94). Mayfly Books.
 
Johanisova, N., & Fraňková, E. (2017). Eco-social enterprises. In C. L. Spash (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics: Nature and society. Routledge (pp. 507-516). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315679747-59
 
Knoblauch, H. (2001). Fokussierte ethnographie: Soziologie, ethnologie und die neue welle der ethnographie. Sozialer Sinn, 2(1), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosi-2001-0105

Koch, M. (2018). Sustainable welfare, degrowth and eco-social policies in Europe. In B. Vanhercke, D. Ghailani, & S. Sabato (Eds.), Social policy in the European Union: State of play 2018 (pp. 35-50). The European Trade Union Institute. https://www.etui.org/publications/books/social-policy-in-the-european-union-state-of-play-2018
 
Kothari, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2014). Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy. Development, 57(3), 362-275. http://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24
 
Kovanen, S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship as a collaborative practice: Literature review and research agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.7341/20211713
 
Lang, T. (2018). Learning by doing. Herausforderungen und methoden transnational vergleichender forschung. In F. Meyer, J. Miggelbrink, & K. Beurskens (Eds.), Ins feld und zurück - Praktische probleme qualitativer forschung in der sozialgeographie (pp. 45-53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55198-1_6
 
Larrabure, M., Vieta, M., & Schugurensky, D. (2011). The 'new cooperativism' in Latin America: Worker recuperated enterprises and socialist production units. Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(2), 181‑196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2011.11661612

Mihály, M. (2019). Opposing peripheralization? A case study of rural social enterprises in Hungary. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 18(2), 551-575. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1559
 
Miller, E. (2019). Reimagining livelihoods: Life beyond economy, society, and environment. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvdtphm5
 
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
 
Paech, N., Rommel, M., & Sperling, C. (2019). Transformatives größenmanagement. Wie lassen sich transformative wirtschaftsformen wirtschaftlich und sozial stabilisieren? In I. Antoni-Komar, C. Kropp, N. Paech, & R. Pfriem (Eds.), Transformative unternehmen und die wende in der ernährungswirtschaft (pp. 129-157). Metropolis.
 
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care. Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1mmfspt
 
Schmid, B., & Smith, T. S. J. (2020). Social transformation and postcapitalist possibility: Emerging dialogues between practice theory and diverse economies. Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 253-275.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520905642
 
Singh, N. M. (2019). Environmental justice, degrowth and post-capitalist futures. Ecological Economics 163, 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.014
 
Szumelda, A. (2020). Stadt und land im fluss. In B. Lange, M. Hülz, B. Schmid, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Postwachstumsgeographien: Raumbezüge diverser und alternativer ökonomien (pp. 193-208). Transcript-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839451809-013

Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Governmentality, 'convenient communities' and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics 26(6), 1015-1034.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1338384
 
Vieta, M. (2010). The new cooperativism [Editorial]. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action, 4(1), 1-11. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6145
 
Weiler, A. M., Otero, G., & Wittman, H. (2016). Rock stars and bad apples: Moral economies of alternative food networks and precarious farm work regimes. Antipode, 48(4), 1140-1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12221
 
Welden, E. A., Chausson, A., & Melanidis, M. S. (2021). Leveraging nature-based solutions for transformation: Reconnecting people and nature. People and Nature, 3(5), 966-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10212
 
Wenger, E. (2008). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity (15th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

UK Society for Co-operative Studies is registered in England and Wales as a charitable incorporated organisation Number 1175295. Our registered office is Holyoake House, Hanover Street, Manchester, M60 0AS.
Log in | Powered by White Fuse